Bombay High Court Justice recuses himself from hearing petitions challenging controversial MSPSA

Why in news

Justice Gautam Ankhad of the Bombay High Court recused himself from hearing petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Special Public Security Act (MSPSA), 2025.

Background

The MSPSA, 2025, is being challenged by political parties and trade unions for allegedly violating fundamental rights. The Bombay High Court's Acting Chief Justice Ravindra Ghuge directed that the petitions should not be listed before any bench including Justice Ankhad.

Facts for Prelims

• ConstitutionArticle 14: Right to Equality
• ConstitutionArticle 19: Freedom of speech, assembly, and association
• ConstitutionArticle 21: Protection of life and personal liberty
• ConstitutionArticle 300A: Right to property
• BodyBombay High Court: One of the oldest High Courts in India

For Mains

Q. Examine the tension between state security measures and the protection of fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution.

Dimensions to cover in your answer

• Balance between public order and individual liberty
• Judicial review of special security laws
• Doctrine of proportionality

Keywords: Judicial Review · Fundamental Rights · Public Order · Constitutional Validity · Recusal

More Polity & Constitution notes

• Supreme Court notices police excesses in NEET protests; forms high-powered investigation committee · 18 August 2026
• Over 47 lakh Delhi voters face exclusion as submission rates plummet · 18 August 2026
• Gyanesh Kumar launches Electoral Literacy Clubs 2.0 in Patna · 18 August 2026
• The Supreme Court emphasized in a judgment that the Election Commission · 18 August 2026
• Karnataka High Court Stuns GBA: No Post-Facto Land Relinquishment for Road Widening · 18 August 2026
• Voter Cleanup: 73 lakh names scrapped, Telangana voter count drops · 17 August 2026

All Polity & Constitution current affairs →