सत्याधीशसत्याधीश
SatyaDheesh
India's Ground Truth Record
Pull to refresh
VOL. I · EST. 11.2025 
SatyaDheesh
सत्याधीश
India's Ground Truth Record
LIVE

CJI Kant: Sharma Gets Fair Chance to Respond Amid Mehta's Accusations

GS2Polity · Governance · IR· Judiciary & landmark judgments· Mains·

Why in news

CJI Surya Kant addressed allegations made by Justice Sandeep Mehta against the Acting Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court, emphasizing the need for established internal mechanisms over public adjudication.

Background

The Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant intervened regarding accusations made by Justice Sandeep Mehta against Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Acting Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court. The CJI stated that the collegium is considering high court appointments while ensuring a fair opportunity for the accused to respond.

Facts for Prelims

  • PostCJI Surya Kant is the current Chief Justice of India.
  • BodyThe Collegium system is the mechanism for appointing and transferring judges in India.
  • FactThe Rajasthan High Court is one of the state high courts in India.

For Mains

Q. Discuss the importance of internal mechanisms and judicial ethics in maintaining the integrity of the higher judiciary in India.

Dimensions to cover in your answer

  • judicial accountability
  • collegium transparency
  • preservation of institutional integrity
  • due process of law

Keywords: judicial integrity · due process · collegium system · accountability · institutional ethics

Read the full news →Report a mistake in this noteSource: NDTV ↗Also: GS4 · Ethics in public administration

More Polity & Constitution notes

All Polity & Constitution current affairs →

Something wrong, or something missing?

Spotted a mistake in a note, or want a topic, format or PDF that would help your preparation? Write to us. We read every mail and fix errors fast.

Report a mistake →Ask for something →[email protected]

This note is generated automatically from SatyaDheesh's news feed and mapped to the UPSC CSE syllabus. Check facts against the original report or PIB before using them in an answer.