Supreme Court strength reaches 37 as Chief Justice Surya Kant swears in three judges
GS2Polity · Governance · IR· Judiciary & landmark judgments· Prelims·
Judicial appointments and sanctioned strength: a relevant GS2 topic for Polity and Judiciary.
Why in news
Chief Justice Surya Kant administered the oath of office to three new judges, bringing the Supreme Court's working strength to 37.
Background
The Supreme Court's sanctioned strength was increased from 34 to 38 judges earlier in 2026. The new appointees include Justice Sunita Agarwal, Justice Upadhyaya, and Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh.
Facts for Prelims
- FactSupreme Court working strength reached 37 after the swearing-in of three new judges.
- FactThe sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court is 38 judges, including the Chief Justice.
- BodyThe Supreme Court Collegium recommended the elevations on September 28.
- FactJustice Sunita Agarwal's appointment brings the number of women judges in the Supreme Court to three.
- PostJustice Sunita Agarwal served as Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court before her elevation.
Prelims practice question
With reference to the Supreme Court of India, consider the following statements:
- The appointment of Justice Sunita Agarwal brings the number of women judges in the Supreme Court to five.
- The working strength of the Supreme Court reached 37 after the swearing-in of three new judges.
- The sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court is 38 judges.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a)1 only
- (b)1 and 2 only
- (c)2 and 3 only
- (d)1, 2 and 3
Show answer
Answer: (c) 2 and 3 only — Statements 2 and 3 are correct. Statement 1 is incorrect: The appointment brings the number of women judges to three.
For Mains
Q. Examine the role of the Supreme Court Collegium in ensuring judicial independence while balancing the need for timely appointments to the higher judiciary.
Dimensions to cover in your answer
- Institutional autonomy: Balancing the executive's role in notification with the Collegium's recommendation power.
- Judicial diversity: Impact of gender representation in the higher judiciary on inclusive justice delivery.
- Vacancy management: Implications of the gap between sanctioned strength and working strength on judicial pendency.
Keywords: Judicial Independence · Supreme Court Collegium · Judicial Appointments · Gender Representation · Sanctioned Strength
More Polity & Constitution notes
- SC rules against complete Delhi Metro prohibition to balance safety with commuter rights · 10 October 2026
- PIL seeks writ of mandamus to fill vacancies in 14 Maharashtra government bodies · 10 October 2026
- MP High Court strikes down law increasing OBC reservation from 14% to 27% · 10 October 2026
- ECI caps voter deletion requests at 10 after Karnataka bulk filing controversy · 10 October 2026
- Tamil Nadu files Supreme Court affidavit accusing Karnataka of resource hoarding · 10 October 2026
- Kerala government to request President return Private Universities Bill via Article 201 · 9 October 2026
Something wrong, or something missing?
Spotted a mistake in a note, or want a topic, format or PDF that would help your preparation? Write to us. We read every mail and fix errors fast.
This note is generated automatically from SatyaDheesh's news feed and mapped to the UPSC CSE syllabus. Check facts against the original report or PIB before using them in an answer.