सत्याधीशसत्याधीश
SatyaDheesh
India's Ground Truth Record
Pull to refresh
VOL. I · EST. 11.2025 
SatyaDheesh
सत्याधीश
India's Ground Truth Record
LIVE

Users who consider online banking "very safe" more likely to be cybercrime victims

GS3Economy · S&T · Environment · Security· Cyber security· Prelims + Mains·

Cybersecurity and digital literacy: a GS3 Internal Security case study on social engineering and fraud.

Why in news

The Status of Policing in India Report (SPIR) 2026 revealed a paradox where users perceiving online banking as 'very safe' are more susceptible to cybercrime victimization.

Background

The SPIR 2026 report highlights that UPI processed over 24,000 crore transactions in FY 2025-26. Fraudsters utilize kits costing ₹10,000-20,000 to swindle crores by employing recruited individuals as replaceable links in the crime chain.

Facts for Prelims

  • FactUPI processed over 24,000 crore transactions in FY 2025-26
  • Report / IndexStatus of Policing in India Report (SPIR) 2026
  • FactFraud kits used by cybercriminals cost between ₹10,000 and ₹20,000

Prelims practice question

With reference to the Status of Policing in India Report (SPIR) 2026, consider the following statements:

  1. Users perceiving online banking as very safe are more susceptible to cybercrime victimization.
  2. UPI processed over 24,000 crore transactions in FY 2025-26.
  3. Fraud kits used by cybercriminals cost between ₹50,000 and ₹1,00,000.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. (a)1 and 2 only
  2. (b)1 and 3 only
  3. (c)2 and 3 only
  4. (d)1, 2 and 3
Show answer

Answer: (a) 1 and 2 only — Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is incorrect: The report states fraud kits cost between ₹10,000 and ₹20,000.

For Mains

Q. Discuss the challenges in securing India's digital payment ecosystem against sophisticated cybercrime syndicates and the role of user awareness in mitigating fraud.

Dimensions to cover in your answer

  • Psychological vulnerability: Overconfidence in digital security leading to lower vigilance against social engineering
  • Structural loophole: Use of recruited individuals as replaceable links complicates the identification of primary perpetrators
  • Economic scale: High transaction volume in UPI creates a massive surface area for automated and manual fraud

Keywords: Cybercrime victimization · Digital payment security · Social engineering · Cyber-syndicates · Digital literacy

Read the full news →Source: The Hindu ↗Also: GS2 · e-Governance & citizen services

More Internal Security notes

All Internal Security current affairs →

This note is generated automatically from SatyaDheesh's news feed and mapped to the UPSC CSE syllabus. Check facts against the original report or PIB before using them in an answer.