सत्याधीशसत्याधीश
SatyaDheesh
India's Ground Truth Record
Pull to refresh
VOL. I · EST. 11.2025 
SatyaDheesh
सत्याधीश
India's Ground Truth Record
LIVE

Bombay High Court rules Special Intensive Revision draft roll cannot delete voter names

GS2Polity · Governance · IR· Elections, ECI & electoral reforms· Prelims + Mains·

Procedural fairness and the right to be heard: a GS2 case study on democratic inclusion and administrative law.

Why in news

The Bombay High Court ruled that the Special Intensive Revision draft roll cannot be used to delete voter names without providing hearings to the affected individuals.

Background

A Division Bench of Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar and Justice Valmiki Menees ruled on September 30, 2026, against the Election Commission of India's practice of deleting names without hearings. The case involved Paresh Salgaonkar and five family members whose names were removed after the ERONET software rejected their Form 8 applications.

Facts for Prelims

  • FactForm 8 is the application used for inclusion, correction, or shifting of entries in the electoral roll.
  • S&TERONET is the software used by the Election Commission for processing electoral data.
  • PlaceThe ruling was issued by the Bombay High Court.

Prelims practice question

Which software is used by the Election Commission for processing electoral data?

  1. (a)VoterID
  2. (b)SVEEP
  3. (c)ERONET
  4. (d)SAMS
Show answer

Answer: (c) ERONET — The note identifies ERONET as the software used by the Election Commission for processing electoral data.

For Mains

Q. Examine the importance of procedural fairness and the right to be heard in the maintenance of electoral rolls to ensure inclusive democratic participation.

Dimensions to cover in your answer

  • Due process: Requirement of personal hearings before removing names from electoral rolls
  • Technological bias: Risks of automated software (ERONET) rejecting valid applications without human oversight
  • Democratic integrity: Ensuring voter list accuracy while preventing arbitrary disenfranchisement

Keywords: procedural fairness · electoral roll · right to be heard · technological oversight · democratic inclusion

Read the full news →Report a mistake in this noteSource: The Hindu ↗

More Polity & Constitution notes

All Polity & Constitution current affairs →

Something wrong, or something missing?

Spotted a mistake in a note, or want a topic, format or PDF that would help your preparation? Write to us. We read every mail and fix errors fast.

Report a mistake →Ask for something →[email protected]

This note is generated automatically from SatyaDheesh's news feed and mapped to the UPSC CSE syllabus. Check facts against the original report or PIB before using them in an answer.